点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
“钢轨医生”春运故事：零下2℃为高铁隧道“把脉问诊”******
(新春走基层)“钢轨医生”春运故事：零下2℃为高铁隧道“把脉问诊”
中新网宁波1月16日电(林波 朱小刚)“李康，晚上施工你负责下行侧隧道边墙检查。”“吴海瑞，你和王达负责清运杂草，夜间天气寒冷，大家都注意保暖。”“好的，我们会按标作业，注意保暖。”
窗外，夜色浓烈，凛冽的寒风呼呼地吹着。室内，灯火通明，回荡着阵阵应答声。
近日，在中国铁路上海局集团有限公司宁波工务段椒江桥隧工区会议室里，工区班前点名会正在举行，该工区工长王海松对7位职工的工作进行分工。
当日23时，职工们按照各自分工到工具间准备作业用的机工具。
此时，深夜江边雾气来袭，短时间内能见度不到10米，只有几盏头灯闪烁着微弱的光。幸运的是，不一会儿雾气就有所消散，“钢轨医生”们搭乘工程车，赶赴杭台高铁下北山二号隧道进口，等待进网作业命令。
命令下达后，他们进入隧道，分三组进行作业。
隧道拱顶混凝土结构检查现场。 王威 摄据悉，下北山二号隧道全长429米，虽是一座短隧道，却是华东地区第一座单洞四线隧道，也是台州站进站咽喉口，在杭台高铁全线位置非常重要。
作业现场，他们利用检查锤、照相机、望远镜和限界测量仪等检测工具，对隧道衬砌、基础沉降和限界等技术指标进行检查。
在工友照明灯的配合下，王海松利用60倍变焦望远镜，对隧道拱顶的混凝土结构进行检查。隧道里温度较低，湿度较大，灯光也不够亮，王海松和工友配合着对隧道拱顶混凝土结构进行逐个分段分格检查。
“这次有雾气，所以镜头不太清楚，只有频繁清理镜头，才能看得更清楚、更准确。”每隔一段时间，王海松就停下来对望远镜进行擦拭，确保现场观测的精准度。
在仔细检查隧道衬砌后，他们又打开中心水沟盖板，对水沟进行检查，这时王海松发现水沟里有一处细小的泥土淤积，约一厘米高。
“短隧道火车快速行驶，尘土、铁屑等杂物容易被吹进来，在中心水沟形成淤泥堆积，我们要用铁锹等工具把淤泥处理掉，确保排水通畅。”王海松如是介绍。
与此同时，另外两组人利用检查锤，对隧道上行侧和下行侧的边墙进行敲击，确认墙体是否有空响，并对高铁未开通前整治过的细小问题进行复检。
检查记录现场。 王威 摄“95后”职工李康在该工区从事桥隧检修作业已经有8年，每天0时到4时的四个小时作业里，他做的工作简单又重复，就是用检查锤不断敲击边墙或者拿着本子对数据进行记录。
当日凌晨，隧道里的温度已下降到零下2℃，李康的脸上却冒出了汗。
“我们在敲击过程中，每一步都得仔细、认真，每一块都不能漏下，并把问题全部记录下来，立马去现场整治。对我们而言，这项工作虽然很累，但还是感到很自豪，能为列车运行安全做最好的保障。”李康如是说。
2023年的春运是杭台高铁开通后的第二个春运。其间，这些“钢轨医生”们将对铁路沿线隧道、桥梁等设备进行加密检查，对相关技术指标进行“把脉问诊”，确保高铁旅客安全出行。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)